The motto of buried in Facebook’s Libra White Paper is to bring billions of people into the global financial system. Libra could change the way people trust each other on the internet by launching a price-stable cryptocurrency. Individuals of the association have taken decentralized and portable digital identity as a prerequisite to financial inclusion and competition and that is why they want to promote an open identity standard. All the papers describing why the terse mention of a foundational issue for 21st century commerce exempted extensive notice but as per some critics the line dropped like a bomb. By utilizing identity, smoothing ways on the internet is a big deal. Facebook is attempting to fix the identity problem.
In the current situation of business to identify oneself, he needs to provide personal data to prove him devoid of theft and spying. With a view to fixing this problem an individual should provide credentials he holds in physical wallet realized in verifiable digital version which can be trusted across the internet. The solution should be controlled by the individual. This identity describes a person that he is over 18’’ credential. It could be entered via Libra’s cryptocurrency wallet Calibra via one of its partners by its two factor authentication process. On the off chance Libra requires self-sovereign solutions, for that approach Facebook’s endorsement might make more of an impact on the market that say uPort might have done. With a view to accommodating internet users to log in to several services through one set of credentials depending upon oneself CEO Mark Zuckerberg was looking into blockchain’s potential.
By establishing open standards technologists have been trying to fix the problem from the very early age. Through a third-party service OAuth standard let you log in a website. The auspices of W3C have already included things like Decentralized Identifiers and the verifiable credentials standard which are meant to enable self-sovereign digital identity. In fact you already have a set of open standards for verifiable credentials that are basically done and working. People working on identity standards are joined to one another in reaching a common goal. Identity is too big to be owned so those people are deeply committed. Phil Windley (chair at the Sovrin Foundation) confessed the risk of parsing two sentences in Libra’s paper but he paid a discord in that state that ‘’decentralized’’ and ‘’portable’’ are not the same as self-sovereign.
Conjoining the dots
The scale of Libra’s vision is supposed to be bigger enough compared to KYC checks and the regulation around building a global permissioned currency platform. Firms like Mastercard or Kiva folks thought very hard about digital identity. Windley referred by his speech that they are probably thinking the goal of financial inclusion is bigger than just authentication and authorization for a few narrow purposes. A few dots can be participated without any detail on what may involve a decentralized identity standard from Libra’s viewpoint by looking at the ongoing work of George Danezis and his co-founders at Chainspace which is a startup obtained by Facebook in May.
Coconut( a paper explaining a ‘’selective disclosure credential scheme’’) says about the process of a system smart contracts issue user credentials relying on the state of the blockchain. In this system credentials can be jointly issued in a decentralized manner by a group of mutually distrusting authorities which cannot be forged by users. DIDs and verified credentials may be the authentic option for Libra (according to Libra White Paper).